Andy White Anthropology
  • Home
  • Research Interests
    • Complexity Science
    • Prehistoric Social Networks
    • Eastern Woodlands Prehistory
    • Ancient Giants
  • Blog
  • Work in Progress
    • The Kirk Project >
      • Kirk 3D Models list
      • Kirk 3D Models embedded
      • Kirk 2D images >
        • Indiana
        • Kentucky
        • Michigan
        • Ontario
      • Kirk Project Datasets
    • Computational Modeling >
      • FN3D_V3
    • Radiocarbon Compilation
    • Fake Hercules Swords
    • Wild Carolina >
      • Plants >
        • Mosses
        • Ferns
        • Conifers
        • Flowering Plants >
          • Grasses
          • Trees
          • Other Flowering Plants
      • Animals >
        • Birds
        • Mammals
        • Crustaceans
        • Insects
        • Arachnids
        • Millipedes and Centipedes
        • Reptiles and Amphibians
      • Fungi
  • Annotated Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Technical Reports
    • Doctoral Dissertation
  • Bibliography
  • Data

Submitting Data to the Kirk Project

2/12/2016

5 Comments

 
I've been working on laying the groundwork for the Kirk Project.  I've created a new "Kirk Project" page to organize my various blog posts on the subject as well as house a list of the 3D models I've created and the the current distribution map of the sample (I've also created a sub-page just for the models).  I've also prepared some guidelines for submitting data.  Here they are (and here is a pdf file of the same information):
The Kirk Project
Data Submission Guidelines (2/12/2016)
The Kirk Project is an online initiative to assemble a pan-Eastern dataset of primary data about projectile points associated with the Early Archaic “Kirk Horizon” (dating to about 8,800-6,600 BC).  The Kirk Horizon is marked by a distribution of Kirk Corner Notched points that extends across a huge area, from the lower Great Lakes to the Florida Keys. Its existence has been noted for over four decades (i.e., at least since James Tuck’s 1974 paper “Early Archaic Horizons in Eastern North America”).  There has never been a concerted effort to assemble a dataset of sufficient detail and spatial scope to allow us to characterize and analyze the kinds, amounts, and spatial components of variability among these points. The goal of the Kirk Project is assemble such a dataset.

What Information is Useful?

In order to be useful to the project, information about Kirk points must have at least two components:
​
  • at least a county-level provenience;

  • scaled visual or virtual representation (i.e., a scaled photograph or a 3D model).

If we don’t know where it came from and/or we can’t pull size/shape data from it, the information will be of very limited usefulness to the project and, in my judgement, not worth including. 

The presence of a third piece of information (lithic raw material) is highly desirable but not necessary for inclusion.

NOTE: incomplete/broken points are still useful as long as they retain enough diagnostic characteristics to be lumped into a broad “Kirk” category. If you can tell it’s a Kirk and you know where it came from, chances are that it retains some measurable/classifiable features that would be useful to know about.

A Brief Description of the Database

The main database for the Kirk Project will be a continuation of the relational database I used to record points in northern Indiana and, later, for my dissertation.  Each point in the database (Kirk or otherwise) gets a unique ID number that makes it distinct from all other points. 

The database includes a variety of tables that are linked together (see figure). The main table is “Artifact_Data_Non_metric.”  This table stores the basic information about the point including ID number, other associated “external” numbers (i.e., assigned in collections or publications), general typological classification, raw material, county-level provenience, and some basic non-metric attributes (presence/absence of basal grinding; presence/absence of beveled blade edges, etc.).

As shown in the diagram, several of the fields in “Artifact_Data_Non_metric” link to other tables.  The field “County” links to a table containing the approximate UTM coordinates of the center of the county. The field “ID_No” links to a table containing metric data that I derived from artifact images (for my dissertation).  The structure of the database will undoubtedly change as the project develops.
Picture
The full database contains some information (such as site-level coordinates and information about personal collections) that will not be made publicly available. 

To make the primary data accessible and usable, I will design a query to produce a dataset containing all the Kirk points in the database by unique ID number. Information for each point will include, minimally, other identifying numbers, county-level provenience (and associated UTM coordinates), raw material information, non-metric attributes, available metric data, and links to 3D models if available. I’ll have to figure out how to store and make accessible online all the images that will accompany a spreadsheet of the data.

How Do I Submit Data?

2D Image submission: Each point submitted must be represented by a good-quality, plan view photograph of the point accompanied by a metric scale. Please name the image files with your last name and unique, sequential numbers (for example, Joan Smith submits images of three Kirk points and labels them “Smith 1,” “Smith 2,” and “Smith 3”). 

3D model submission: Points submitted as 3D models should be numbered the same as images (for example, Joan Smith submits models of three Kirk points that are different than those in the images she submitted and labels them “Smith 4,” “Smith 5,” and “Smith 6”).  Save models in STL format.

Both regular 2D images and 3D models should be accompanied by a spreadsheet or table that lists the images/models by their filenames and provides the following information:
Picture
  • Image Name: the file name of the image.
  • County: The county with two-letter state/province abbreviation appended.
  • Site Number: Smithsonian trinomial site designation or Canadian site number.
  • Other Numbers: Numbers assigned for museum curation, other analyses, publication, etc.  Knowing these numbers will help us avoid including the same point more than once.
  • Curated: Where is the point currently kept?
  • Raw Material:  The lithic raw material of the point, if known with a high degree of confidence. If you suspect a certain raw material but have doubts, add a “?” at the end.
  • Basal Grinding:  Score the presence of grinding along the basal edge as “present” or “absent.”
  • Bevel side: Does the point have beveled blade edges?  If so, indicate if the bevel is visible on the left-hand side (LHB) or right-hand side (RHB) when you look at the point with the tip pointed up. If the point is not beveled, leave blank.
  • Bevel class: If the point is beveled, classify the degree of beveling as either “bevel” (there is a strong boundary line between the resharpened edge and the original blade surface that creates a diamond-shaped cross-section) or “twist” (asymmetrically resharpened, but no strong boundary line).
 
Where Do I Send Data?
​

Email your 2D images and spreadsheets to Andy White: aawhite@mailbox.sc.edu.

To transfer 3D models, use an upload/display/download service like Sketchfab (www.sketchfab.com). Sketchfab lets you upload models < 50 MB for free.
5 Comments
Josh
2/14/2016 04:29:22 am

Back in the day, my folks used to tell me about a college buddy of theirs (I think his name is Russ), who apparently has one of the biggest collections of arrowheads in Iowa, if not a contender for the midwest. They were all outdoor hippies, so this guy found all these arrowheads himself and apparently amassed quite a collection over the years.

You're looking for data about "points," though, right? As in, usually stone points that were used as tools or spearheads? Because I was gonna say I could probably figure out a way to put you in touch with this guy, or at least pass along an email link to this blog entry. But from what I understood -- and I could be wrong since laypeople like me and my folks always use the generic term "arrowheads") -- that's what his collection mostly consisted of; Native American arrowheads found around the areas of Iowa, Nebraska and Colorado...

Reply
Greg Little
2/14/2016 09:02:14 am

Hi Josh: You are aware of this but Dr White's wanting data on a very specific type of point: http://www.projectilepoints.net/Points/Kirk_Corner.html
If I'm wrong I'm sure he'll correct this. I've never collected points, but like you, I know a lot of people who do. Sadly, virtually none of them took enough care to label the particular site where they collected them. I also think that some of us interested enough in White's posts can't really assist at all in such matters. Maybe he should make another Fund Me page to assist.

Reply
John S. Richburg, Jr.
2/17/2017 06:15:08 am

I have an extensive collection of personal finds by me or my Dad. I have detailed (GPS) data on all points I found but only county level data on my Dad's finds. I have a personal site number but most sites do not have an official site number. I have submitted site data but so far most of my sites have not been given an official site number. I have pictures on file but they were taken with an English ruler and not a metric ruler. I am willing to help if you need partial data I have. Contact Steven Meredith mered003@gmail.com for more info about me and my collection. Let me know if you want my help.

Reply
Andy White
3/6/2017 09:55:36 am

Hi John,

Thanks for the comment. I'm interested in looking at what you've got, particularly if you've already got photographs with a scale (it doesn't matter if it's English or metric) and everything has a location (county-level is fine for what I'm doing). Could you pleas send me an email at aawhite@mailbox.sc.edu ? Thanks!

Reply
Erika K Smith
8/13/2019 05:35:47 am

I recently found a projectile point on the beach in SC. I remember exactly where I found it. I can take scaled images of it and send it to you if you're interested. I work with some archaeologist and they suggested it might be Kirk-like but also had a lot of questions about it as well.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    All views expressed in my blog posts are my own. The views of those that comment are their own. That's how it works.

    I reserve the right to take down comments that I deem to be defamatory or harassing. 

    Andy White

    Follow me on Twitter: @Andrew_A_White

    Email me: andy.white.zpm@gmail.com

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    Picture

    Sick of the woo?  Want to help keep honest and open dialogue about pseudo-archaeology on the internet? Please consider contributing to Woo War Two.
    Picture

    Follow updates on posts related to giants on the Modern Mythology of Giants page on Facebook.

    Archives

    January 2023
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    March 2021
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    3D Models
    AAA
    Adena
    Afrocentrism
    Agent Based Modeling
    Agent-based Modeling
    Aircraft
    Alabama
    Aliens
    Ancient Artifact Preservation Society
    Androgynous Fish Gods
    ANTH 227
    ANTH 291
    ANTH 322
    Anthropology History
    Anunnaki
    Appalachia
    Archaeology
    Ardipithecus
    Art
    Atlantis
    Australia
    Australopithecines
    Aviation History
    Bigfoot
    Birds
    Boas
    Book Of Mormon
    Broad River Archaeological Field School
    Bronze Age
    Caribou
    Carolina Bays
    Ceramics
    China
    Clovis
    Complexity
    Copper Culture
    Cotton Mather
    COVID-19
    Creationism
    Croatia
    Crow
    Demography
    Denisovans
    Diffusionism
    DINAA
    Dinosaurs
    Dirt Dance Floor
    Double Rows Of Teeth
    Dragonflies
    Early Archaic
    Early Woodland
    Earthworks
    Eastern Woodlands
    Eastern Woodlands Household Archaeology Data Project
    Education
    Egypt
    Europe
    Evolution
    Ewhadp
    Fake Hercules Swords
    Fetal Head Molding
    Field School
    Film
    Florida
    Forbidden Archaeology
    Forbidden History
    Four Field Anthropology
    Four-field Anthropology
    France
    Genetics
    Genus Homo
    Geology
    Geometry
    Geophysics
    Georgia
    Giants
    Giants Of Olden Times
    Gigantism
    Gigantopithecus
    Graham Hancock
    Grand Valley State
    Great Lakes
    Hollow Earth
    Homo Erectus
    Hunter Gatherers
    Hunter-gatherers
    Illinois
    India
    Indiana
    Indonesia
    Iowa
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jim Vieira
    Jobs
    Kensington Rune Stone
    Kentucky
    Kirk Project
    Late Archaic
    Lemuria
    Lithic Raw Materials
    Lithics
    Lizard Man
    Lomekwi
    Lost Continents
    Mack
    Mammoths
    Mastodons
    Maya
    Megafauna
    Megaliths
    Mesolithic
    Michigan
    Middle Archaic
    Middle Pleistocene
    Middle Woodland
    Midwest
    Minnesota
    Mississippi
    Mississippian
    Missouri
    Modeling
    Morphometric
    Mound Builder Myth
    Mu
    Music
    Nazis
    Neandertals
    Near East
    Nephilim
    Nevada
    New Mexico
    Newspapers
    New York
    North Carolina
    Oahspe
    Oak Island
    Obstetrics
    Ohio
    Ohio Valley
    Oldowan
    Olmec
    Open Data
    Paleoindian
    Paleolithic
    Pilumgate
    Pleistocene
    Pliocene
    Pre Clovis
    Pre-Clovis
    Prehistoric Families
    Pseudo Science
    Pseudo-science
    Radiocarbon
    Reality Check
    Rome
    Russia
    SAA
    Sardinia
    SCIAA
    Science
    Scientific Racism
    Sculpture
    SEAC
    Search For The Lost Giants
    Sexual Dimorphism
    Sitchin
    Social Complexity
    Social Networks
    Solutrean Hypothesis
    South Africa
    South America
    South Carolina
    Southeast
    Stone Holes
    Subsistence
    Swordgate
    Teaching
    Technology
    Teeth
    Television
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Topper
    Travel
    Travel Diaries
    Vaccines
    Washington
    Whatzit
    White Supremacists
    Wisconsin
    Woo War Two
    World War I
    World War II
    Writing
    Younger Dryas

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly