Andy White Anthropology
  • Home
  • Research Interests
    • Complexity Science
    • Prehistoric Social Networks
    • Eastern Woodlands Prehistory
    • Ancient Giants
  • Blog
  • Work in Progress
    • The Kirk Project >
      • Kirk 3D Models list
      • Kirk 3D Models embedded
      • Kirk 2D images >
        • Indiana
        • Kentucky
        • Michigan
        • Ontario
      • Kirk Project Datasets
    • Computational Modeling >
      • FN3D_V3
    • Radiocarbon Compilation
    • Fake Hercules Swords
    • Wild Carolina >
      • Plants >
        • Mosses
        • Ferns
        • Conifers
        • Flowering Plants >
          • Grasses
          • Trees
          • Other Flowering Plants
      • Animals >
        • Birds
        • Mammals
        • Crustaceans
        • Insects
        • Arachnids
        • Millipedes and Centipedes
        • Reptiles and Amphibians
      • Fungi
  • Annotated Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Technical Reports
    • Doctoral Dissertation
  • Bibliography
  • Data

Robert Sepehr's "Species with Amnesia:" Sneak Peek Plagiarism Report

10/8/2016

33 Comments

 
Picture
Next up in my Forbidden Archaeology class is a critical reading of the 2015 book Species with Amnesia by Robert Sepehr. I chose this book because it checked the boxes for many of the issues that I'd like to address in our section on "ice age civilization" and I could find no existing, detailed, online appraisal of its claims.

I'm quickly working my way through the book this weekend, prepping for our in-class discussions and assembling a list of topics for the students' next round of blog posts. My plan is to do a sort of distributed "group" critique of the book, assigning a small section or particular claim to each of the twenty students. While I'm familiar with many of the things discussed in the book, it is jam packed with assertions about "evidence" that I've never come across before. It will be fun to turn the students loose on a set of those claims and see what they come up with.

Another thing that I've discovered during my quick reading is . . . wait for it . . . plagiarism! This probably will not come as a shock to those of you familiar with these kinds of works, as plagiarism is endemic in the "fringe" world. I don't yet have a sense of how much of the content of the book is thinly-modified cut-and-paste, I just know that I've stumbled onto several examples without even really trying.

Here's a passage from Species with Amnesia about the Peruvian "Lady of the Mask" mummy (page 102):

"Piercing blue eyes undimmed by the passing of 1,300 years, this is the "Lady of the Mask" a mummy with striking blue eyes, whose discovery could reveal the secrets of a lost culture at the Huaca Pucllana Pyramid located in Lima, Peru."

And here are the first two paragraphs of a 2008 article in the Daily Mail: 

"Piercing blue eyes undimmed by the passing of 1,300 years, this is the Lady of the Mask – a mummy whose discovery could reveal the secrets of a lost culture.
​

She was found by archaeologists excavating a pyramid in Peru’s capital city Lima, alongside two other adult mummies and the sacrificial remains of a child."
(Note to students: adding quotation marks around a phrase ("Lady of the Mask") and deleting a hyphen does not transform someone else's work into your own work. I don't see the Daily Mail article in the bibliography, and there are no citations in the paragraph.

That's pretty clear and simple. I found a more tangled case in one of Sepehr's discussions of Cro-Magnon. He seems to have paraphrased and sometimes borrowed directly either from a piece by Carson Reed on this website (about Cro-Magnon, Atlantis, and the teachings of Madame Blavatsky) or from R. Cedric Leonard (also used by Reed).  Here is a passage from Species with Amnesia (page 49):

"Many Cro-Magnon villages consisted of houses, but we don't know what they were made of. All we have are the remains of hearths and post hole patterns."

Here is a sentence from Reed's piece:

"These cave men also had houses! We do not know what exactly they were made of but we do have the post holes."
Here is another passage from Species with Amnesia (page 45):

"Professor of anthropology at Rutgers University, Dr. John E. Pfeiffer, observes that the Aurignacian was quite distinct and that it arrived from some area outside of Western Europe; with an already "established way of life.""


And from Reed's piece:

"Dr. John E. Pfeiffer, professor of anthropology at Rutgers University observes: "The Aurignacian is quite distinct from the Parigordian" [ a separate older European style ]; they arrive "from some area outside of Western Europe"; with an already "established way of life.""


Reed cites R. Cedric Leonard at the end of this section and provides a URL. Sepehr cites Leonard's (2011) book after his sentence about Pfeiffer.  On Leonard's webpage we find this sentence:

"Dr. John E. Pfeiffer, professor of anthropology at Rutgers University observes: "The Aurignacian is quite distinct from the Perigordian"; they arrive "from some area outside of Western Europe"; with an already "established way of life.""

So it's possible that Sepehr plagiarized Reed, or perhaps plagiarized Leonard directly. I suppose it doesn't really matter.

As I skimmed through Leonard's webpage, I recognized more sentences from Species with Amnesia. Compare these two passages:

"In an article entitled "Why don't We Call Them Cro-Magnon Anymore?", K. Krist Hirst suggests that the physical dimensions of Cro-Magnon specimens are not sufficiently different from modern humans to warrant a separate designation. Leonard raises the concern that this would make it all too convenient to eliminate the embarrassing origin problem. And what about the even more important cultural differences (totally differing tool kits, settlement patterns, art impulse, etc.)? (38) Are we to simply "bland out" all these diversities under one designation? This doesn't strike me as a scientific practice."

That's from Species with Amnesia (page 48). This is from Leonard's webpage:

​"In an article entitled "Why don't We Call Them Cro-Magnon Anymore?" the author K. Krist Hirst suggests that the physical dimensions of Cro-Magnon specimens are not sufficiently different from modern humans to warrant a separate designation. My concern, of course, is that this would make it all too convenient to eliminate the embarrassing origin problem. And what about the even more important culture differences (totally differing tool kits, settlement patterns, art impulse, etc.)? Are we to simply "bland out" all these diversities under one designation? This doesn't strike me as scientific anthropological practice."

The (38) in Sepehr's passage is a citation to Leonard's book, so he is acknowledging him in some way. But any real scholar (and, indeed, any reasonably honest high school student) will tell you that dropping a citation in the middle of a paragraph copied almost word-for-word but not quoted is Plagiarism 101. A person reading Sepehr's passage is left with the impression that the idea of "important cultural differences" came from Leonard but all the the other ideas and words are Sepehr's. Obviously that's not the case.

Hopefully there are some original ideas and some original writing in Species with Amnesia. I'd rather spend my time addressing those then stumbling over sloppy plagiarism.

Update (10/8/2016): This is turning into a bummer. A passage from this webpage ("Atlantis the Myth" by  Alan G. Hefner) appears word for word in Species with Amnesia (pages 107-108):

"According to ancient Egyptian temple records the Athenians fought an aggressive war against the rulers of Atlantis some nine thousand years earlier and won.These ancient and powerful kings or rulers of Atlantis had formed a confederation by which they controlled Atlantis and other islands as well. They began a war from their homeland in the Atlantic Ocean and sent fighting troops to Europe and Asia. Against this attack the men of Athens formed a coalition from all over Greece to halt it. When this coalition met difficulties their allies deserted them and the Athenians fought on alone to defeat the Atlantian rulers. They stopped an invasion of their own country as well as freeing Egypt and eventually every country under the control of the rulers of Atlantis."

The section right after that (pages 108-109) is apparently cribbed directly from this 2013 blog post, changing a few words.

Then the section on Iran (page 109) has sections apparently from this webpage.

Update (10/8/2016):

The section on the Berbers (pages 86-87) also apparently contains plagiarized material. From Species with Amnesia:

"The Berbers are considered the aboriginals of the area and their origins beyond that are not officially known. Many theories have been advanced relating them to the Canaanites, the Phoenicians, the Celts, and the Caucasians from Anatolia. In classical times the Berbers formed such states as Mauritania and Numidia."

Here is a section from the same Carson Reed piece discussed earlier:

"From a useful traditional source:

Despite a history of conquests, the Berbers retained a remarkably homogeneous culture, which, on the evidence of Egyptian tomb paintings, derives from earlier than 2400 B.C. The alphabet of the only partly deciphered ancient Libyan inscriptions is close to the script still used by the Tuareg. The origins of the Berbers are uncertain, although many theories have been advanced relating them to the Canaanites, the Phoenicians, the Celts, the Basques, and the Caucasians. In classical times the Berbers formed such states as Mauritania and Numidia. (http://www.answers.com/topic/berber-people)"

So Sepehr apparently just copied his analysis of the Berbers from answers.com. Great.

Continuing on, part of his discussion of the Guanaches of the Canary Islands matches text on this DNA ancestry site. Here is a passage from Species with Amnesia (page 88):

"Isolated in their islands, the Guanches preserved their pristine Cro-Magnon genetic traits in a more or less pure fashion until the arrival of the Spanish."

And from Family Tree DNA: 

"Isolated in their islands, the Guanches were prevented, until the advent of the Spanish, from sexually mingling with other races. So, they preserved their pristine Cro-Magnon genetic traits in a more or less pure fashion until that date."
33 Comments
mogimbo
10/8/2016 02:15:56 pm

Is this book written by some sort of fringe bot?

Reply
Grahamq
10/8/2016 03:12:52 pm

Or a Wikipedia editor, I've seen the same kind of minor-rewording 'copy/paste' turn up on the lesser visited Wikipedia pages, although the editors seem to be getting better at policing this kind of thing.

Reply
E.P. Grondine
10/9/2016 06:36:24 am

It is well known amoung these writers that you have to use more than 500 words before you need to get permissions. If you're expecting citations from any of them - oh well.

Reply
Andy White
10/9/2016 06:39:14 am

I think your conflating plagiarism and fair use.

Reply
Jim
10/9/2016 07:49:07 am

Jeez, are you sure "he who shall not be named" didn't have another change of identity we don't know about ?

Reply
plagiarism checker tool link
11/12/2016 03:33:46 pm

some original ideas and some original writing in Species with Amnesia. I'd rather spend my time addressing those then stumbling over sloppy plagiarism

Reply
Captain Richard Arlington Briggs, Jr. link
3/18/2017 09:11:42 pm

G'day Andy!
Howdy from Central Texas.
Who is this "Robert Sepehr?"
What are his university credentials?
Thanks mate.
Cheers, Capt. Rick.

Reply
Jane Elliott
6/19/2018 02:35:17 pm

I was just unfriended by Robert Sepehr on FB for asking a harmless question that appeared to challenge his theory (of which I was unaware at the time). Certainly he's more of a salesperson on FB than a person open to discussion. I just checked the internet to see what kind of reputation he had.

Reply
Nick Letica link
9/1/2021 08:22:57 am

Sepehr is a mainstream history reject and creepiest troll

Reply
Ripper
8/20/2022 02:26:22 am

You're a fucking nigger kike.

iyah uddin
7/2/2018 07:08:21 am

for heavens sake you just dedicated a web page to petty nonsense, its not even a claim that the author was take credit for someone else's discovery or work.

the whole copy write thing then is stupid. nothing it original everything is an extension of what we know, read, learn...

gosh more petty then bride maids...

Reply
The Monarch & Dr. Girlfriend
7/3/2018 03:11:58 am

This idea is ridiculous - I don't think these people realize that those of us in the science community build on top of others' material, that's how it works, we wouldn't have modern medicine, technology, biological or cultural anthropology, engineering etc. without this STANDARD practice. There is zero evidence for plagiarism here and the sources are cited to excess, like "holy crap that's a lot of citing."


It is obvious that Mr. Sepehr has spent a great deal of time, energy, and resources on his study of these subjects as well as bringing this to public awareness. I highly recommend this book and look forward to reading more of his work.

Reply
Andy White
7/3/2018 04:20:20 am

My claim of blatant plagiarism in Sepehr's book is not an "idea," it's a fact-based observation. You should look up the definition of plagiarism. And also familiarize yourself with scholarship. You will find the book to be chock full of the former and vanishingly thin on the latter.

Reply
Arminious Teutoberg
4/3/2020 03:26:51 pm

Andy, your arguments are thin at best. Sepehr may not be perfect but his trajectory of analysis and thought are far more original and interesting than yours.

Artorius
3/22/2020 07:50:56 pm

I concur!

Reply
Muse
4/21/2020 01:49:14 am

I also.

Brock Samson
8/13/2021 07:11:09 am

Mr. Sepehr has many cryptonazi supporters protecting his drivel, like you. Your attraction to him is the same as those who blather support on his various pages, you are white supremacists, and Islamofascists and he makes noises you all like.

Reply
Carl Feagans link
10/3/2018 01:16:17 pm

Andy, you should cross-post this in the Amazon Reviews section of his book for sale there. I think potential readers/buyers should know.

Reply
Karen
10/11/2018 08:29:34 am

I purchased this book about 6 months ago after coming across Robert Sepher on YouTube. He has a really fun and entertaining set of videos that follow his books very closely. I see him more as a budding TV show actor in "Ancient Aliens" or some type of reality tv archeology. I found his videos to be more impressive than the books, but I knew a lot of it was definitely something I'd read about or seen somewhere before. At any rate, I agree that if he was making claims to be the first person to discover such evidence then his goose would be cooked. However, I think he is just trying to point out there are multiple sources who are in agreement with his own theory of what has become a worldwide phenomenon of Ancient Sites with blond hair mummies and the monoliths associated with them. The similarities are remarkable. I'm certainly no expert, but as a consumer of entertainment. Robert Sepher is a new face and a few fresh ideas on some old stories.

Reply
k
11/17/2019 04:10:49 pm

Robert Sepehr does make a lot of ridiculous claims which come awfully close to the kind of Aryanism that the Nazis seemed to prefer. So, I will not defend him. I will how ever criticize your critique.

Pulling random sentences from a long book and comparing them to other articles on on the same topic to make Sepehr appear to be a plagiarist makes me question your definition of plagiarism.

I can take any subject of which little is known and find dozens of examples where those who have speculated on it have written similar sentences. There is very little information to go on. So, everyone is going to quote the same little bits of it. That isn't plagiarism. Its just regurgitation of the same scant information.

If you want to trash the guy, then focus on his claims. After watching some of the things he claims on his YT videos, I think that would be pretty fruitful avenue to travel down.

Reply
Peter
6/29/2020 02:28:39 pm

I agree that in many subjects, those that are well published on and those that are lesser known many people can write sentences that are similar to each other. The difference here is that in at least some of the cases what is written in his book is almost exactly word for word what someone else has written elsewhere.

The best example of this is the quote on Cro-Magnon in which Hirst and Leonard are mentioned. If you go back and try to read each sentence from the two quotes back to back then you can see that almost the entire paragraph is an exact copy with only a small (38) as a citation which is not in the correct format, not to mention the paragraph doesn't have quotes around it identifying it as a quote, and as far as I know Leonard's webpage is not cited in the bibliography.

Even if the webpage is cited in the bibliography the formatting of the quote used is not correct in several ways and would constitute plagiarism in my eyes.

Reply
L
8/13/2021 07:15:46 am

Provide your dozens of examples, you cited them, show them.

Reply
Morley
12/30/2019 06:45:48 pm

Instead of criticizing the man, please criticize the ideas and arguments he has chosen to include in his work.

Reply
Liz M.
7/26/2020 07:35:40 am

I have been watching his videos on YouTube and decided to do some investigating into the man. His tone and content comes off as purely academic, but he is consistent in providing no citation or trail of resources. This has the effect of forcing the listener or reader to immediately absorb information without the connecting information necessary to vet it. Science, anthropology, and history can all be weaponized by politics, and it is our duty as consumers of information to place imbibed content within a frame of reference that analyses who/when/why.
Robert neglects his audience without these critical post signs, and if we ask ourselves the same questions about him, I think we have some answers.
After spending much time listening to Robert, I must confirm that my initial suspicions were correct- he is a white supremacist, a supporter of the nazi party, and he uses unvetted academia to support his belief system.

Reply
Robert S.
8/4/2020 03:58:56 am

I’d like to see my white supremacy all over your face after I get done beating up your lower shakra with my cro-magnum.

It is common knowledge that the ancestors of blacks mated with some sort of animal to create today’s sub-Saharan blacks. It explains their savage behavior and the I.Q. gap.

Reply
Zla'od
9/3/2020 05:58:34 pm

Nigga please--it's spelled "chakra."

Graham H
9/27/2020 06:16:18 am

Sheesh what nonsense. It seems just the mention of the term 'Aryan' triggers the hordes of desperate lefty sjw's hiding in the shadows waiting for the slightest opportunity to engage in the outrage olympics. You can wreck a career with this kind of vicious, unsubstantiated anecdotal garbage. You should be shamed of yourself.

Reply
Jason
3/3/2021 11:20:12 am

Graham would you say this about someone who takes issue with Robert's claim, directly above your comment and predating it, that:

"It is common knowledge that the ancestors of blacks mated with some sort of animal to create today’s sub-Saharan blacks. It explains their savage behavior and the I.Q. gap."

It seems the defenders of this charlatan Sepehr have a lot in common...

Graham Cracker
8/13/2021 07:21:16 am

But, you're a white supremacist defending a Nazi fauxologist, which invalidates your comment. It's hilarious that you see an article full of examples and call it unsubstantiated, or anecdotal. You don't know what those words mean, obviously.

peter james dallman
11/23/2020 11:24:16 am

I think the lack of citation is perhaps a best wake up call, but I also look at intent. Did he try to pass it off as his, no. This is a new writing style which he talked about and wish I could find again. Readers these days want a loose, 8th grade at best, fast paced Novella not backed up with research citations. They all rely on Google, tell me if you didn't find this out using it, if you could anyone can. Most today simply don't have the attention span. To put them in visually would destroy the appeal. It has to have a comic book less cluttered look. I get it, you don't. I ask did you read every book and watch every video, and then research it. I did, I am an Investigative Mythologist and a expert technical writer of 40 yrs., more degrees than a thermometer as my mom said. My sister, also a successful writer in this type, "get" this new style, he is new Truman Capote.

Reply
Fredster
12/26/2020 04:17:31 am

Robert Sepehr is a good storyteller but his conclusions should not be taken seriously and he knows that very well. Let me give you a quick example of his dishonesty. In his video Anthropology of Occult Secret Societies (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tVELeaXpGM&ab_channel=RobertSepehr), we see a man claim that Earth is a “punitive planet”. A statement that baffled many viewers if we are to look at the reactions in the comment section. A quick search allowed me to obtain a longer version of this individual’s interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zvkm1k578c) but when looking at the whole sequence, his statements come across as ridiculous and lose that magic aura that initially impressed so many. I tried to provide the link in the comment section, especially to those who had commented on it, only to have my comments repeatedly blocked. They were obviously censored through a filter managed by the channel creator himself, as other comments from my same YT account were published without any problem when not containing this link and I could publish that same link in the comment section of other channels as a trial without any issue either.

Reply
Tim R.
1/22/2021 12:55:24 pm

This guy has YouTube documentaries where he actually discusses the belief of certain groups of human beings having sacred bloodlines (descending from gods) and, as such, having the divine right of kings to rule over others. No human beings have such rights, but that’s not really the point. It’s supremacy this guy is espousing—even though he isn’t using those words. This, coupled with his description of being a “harsh critic of the out-of-Africa theory” signify just what kind of supremacist he could be, too. If you google him, he’s listed as a YouTuber, not an author, even though he’s “written” several books. By the way, if the claims in this blog post are true, the plagiarism speaks to his character anyway. But his label on Google as a YouTuber and not an author is extremely telling—because it shows he’s not to be taken seriously as an author because his work has no references and that neither the literary nor technological communities acknowledge his work for that reason, among others. Also, it’s an uphill battle for anybody like him, who looks like a sopping wet dog, to claim to be part of a race with a sacred or divine bloodline. The guy’s a hack.

Reply
Nigger skinner
8/20/2022 02:27:04 am

That's not plagiarism ya dumb nigger.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    All views expressed in my blog posts are my own. The views of those that comment are their own. That's how it works.

    I reserve the right to take down comments that I deem to be defamatory or harassing. 

    Andy White

    Follow me on Twitter: @Andrew_A_White

    Email me: andy.white.zpm@gmail.com

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    Picture

    Sick of the woo?  Want to help keep honest and open dialogue about pseudo-archaeology on the internet? Please consider contributing to Woo War Two.
    Picture

    Follow updates on posts related to giants on the Modern Mythology of Giants page on Facebook.

    Archives

    January 2023
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    March 2021
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    3D Models
    AAA
    Adena
    Afrocentrism
    Agent Based Modeling
    Agent-based Modeling
    Aircraft
    Alabama
    Aliens
    Ancient Artifact Preservation Society
    Androgynous Fish Gods
    ANTH 227
    ANTH 291
    ANTH 322
    Anthropology History
    Anunnaki
    Appalachia
    Archaeology
    Ardipithecus
    Art
    Atlantis
    Australia
    Australopithecines
    Aviation History
    Bigfoot
    Birds
    Boas
    Book Of Mormon
    Broad River Archaeological Field School
    Bronze Age
    Caribou
    Carolina Bays
    Ceramics
    China
    Clovis
    Complexity
    Copper Culture
    Cotton Mather
    COVID-19
    Creationism
    Croatia
    Crow
    Demography
    Denisovans
    Diffusionism
    DINAA
    Dinosaurs
    Dirt Dance Floor
    Double Rows Of Teeth
    Dragonflies
    Early Archaic
    Early Woodland
    Earthworks
    Eastern Woodlands
    Eastern Woodlands Household Archaeology Data Project
    Education
    Egypt
    Europe
    Evolution
    Ewhadp
    Fake Hercules Swords
    Fetal Head Molding
    Field School
    Film
    Florida
    Forbidden Archaeology
    Forbidden History
    Four Field Anthropology
    Four-field Anthropology
    France
    Genetics
    Genus Homo
    Geology
    Geometry
    Geophysics
    Georgia
    Giants
    Giants Of Olden Times
    Gigantism
    Gigantopithecus
    Graham Hancock
    Grand Valley State
    Great Lakes
    Hollow Earth
    Homo Erectus
    Hunter Gatherers
    Hunter-gatherers
    Illinois
    India
    Indiana
    Indonesia
    Iowa
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jim Vieira
    Jobs
    Kensington Rune Stone
    Kentucky
    Kirk Project
    Late Archaic
    Lemuria
    Lithic Raw Materials
    Lithics
    Lizard Man
    Lomekwi
    Lost Continents
    Mack
    Mammoths
    Mastodons
    Maya
    Megafauna
    Megaliths
    Mesolithic
    Michigan
    Middle Archaic
    Middle Pleistocene
    Middle Woodland
    Midwest
    Minnesota
    Mississippi
    Mississippian
    Missouri
    Modeling
    Morphometric
    Mound Builder Myth
    Mu
    Music
    Nazis
    Neandertals
    Near East
    Nephilim
    Nevada
    New Mexico
    Newspapers
    New York
    North Carolina
    Oahspe
    Oak Island
    Obstetrics
    Ohio
    Ohio Valley
    Oldowan
    Olmec
    Open Data
    Paleoindian
    Paleolithic
    Pilumgate
    Pleistocene
    Pliocene
    Pre Clovis
    Pre-Clovis
    Prehistoric Families
    Pseudo Science
    Pseudo-science
    Radiocarbon
    Reality Check
    Rome
    Russia
    SAA
    Sardinia
    SCIAA
    Science
    Scientific Racism
    Sculpture
    SEAC
    Search For The Lost Giants
    Sexual Dimorphism
    Sitchin
    Social Complexity
    Social Networks
    Solutrean Hypothesis
    South Africa
    South America
    South Carolina
    Southeast
    Stone Holes
    Subsistence
    Swordgate
    Teaching
    Technology
    Teeth
    Television
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Topper
    Travel
    Travel Diaries
    Vaccines
    Washington
    Whatzit
    White Supremacists
    Wisconsin
    Woo War Two
    World War I
    World War II
    Writing
    Younger Dryas

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly