Andy White Anthropology
  • Home
  • Research Interests
    • Complexity Science
    • Prehistoric Social Networks
    • Eastern Woodlands Prehistory
    • Ancient Giants
  • Blog
  • Work in Progress
    • The Kirk Project >
      • Kirk 3D Models list
      • Kirk 3D Models embedded
      • Kirk 2D images >
        • Indiana
        • Kentucky
        • Michigan
        • Ontario
      • Kirk Project Datasets
    • Computational Modeling >
      • FN3D_V3
    • Radiocarbon Compilation
    • Fake Hercules Swords
    • Wild Carolina >
      • Plants >
        • Mosses
        • Ferns
        • Conifers
        • Flowering Plants >
          • Grasses
          • Trees
          • Other Flowering Plants
      • Animals >
        • Birds
        • Mammals
        • Crustaceans
        • Insects
        • Arachnids
        • Millipedes and Centipedes
        • Reptiles and Amphibians
      • Fungi
  • Annotated Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Technical Reports
    • Doctoral Dissertation
  • Bibliography
  • Data

Is There Anything Wrong With This Picture?

8/9/2017

20 Comments

 
Picture
Screenshot of photo accompanying a story about a mammoth tooth.
This photograph, used to illustrate a four paragraph story in the Jersey Evening Post yesterday, sparked a heated conversation in the Fraudulent Archaeology Wall of Shame group on Facebook. The admins watching the situation turned off commenting to keep the temperature down but left the originally post up, with the rationale that it was an important discussion but just not on topic for the group.  I thought I'd write a quick blog post to provide a place to continue the discussion here if anyone is interested.

The debate revolved around whether this photo was appropriate for the story, or whether the view was intentionally selected as "click bait" to draw viewers who might not navigate to a story illustrated by a mammoth tooth. This is the only photo.  The story says "the tooth" is pictured in the photo, but what I see is an empty pedestal where the tooth presumably used to be. 
20 Comments
Sara
8/9/2017 08:05:53 am

Guess I'm weird - I saw the post - saw a woman pointing to what appeared to be a rock - didn't see the tooth - moved on. It wasn't until later when I read the thread that I saw her in totality. Still don't see what the big deal is. She's wearing tank top. Boobs happen. Get over yourself. Only the editors of the original post can comment on whether or not they used it because of that. But I didn't see it (or them, rather) until they were pointed out to me....but then I'm a woman and I see them all the time - so perhaps they're not that big of a deal to me.

Reply
Andy White
8/9/2017 10:53:36 am

I'm not sure if the "get over yourself" is directed at me in particular or at people in general. I didn't give my own view of the choice to use this photo to illustrate the story, but mentioned that there was a debate about it.

The reactions to this that I've seen suggest that professionals are bothered little, if at all, by the choice of the photo. Negative reactions seem to be coming predominantly from non-professionals, who seem more put-off by the image choice and more questioning of the motivation. If true, I think that's an interesting observation. Hence writing the post in the first place.

Reply
Sara
8/13/2017 05:38:57 am

The "get over yourself" was not directed at you. Just my poorly worded over generalization.

Joe Scales
8/9/2017 03:01:07 pm

Would you be the Sara from Archy Fantasies? If so, I really enjoy your America Unearthed reviews. Always look forward to them.

As for the picture, I must admit my eyes were drawn in a certain direction... then the tat turned me away. Old fashioned, I know.

Reply
Sara
8/13/2017 05:39:35 am

No. But she is awesome!

Jim
8/9/2017 08:37:52 am

Fake news, probably planted by McDonalds. I don't see any tooth, but she seems to be holding a tasty delicious french fry,,mmmmm, now I'm hungry.

Reply
Raparee
8/9/2017 03:28:33 pm

Just wondering, with all the guffawing and pearl-clutching that this photo has elicited, has anyone considered contacting Ms. Ingrey for her opinion?

Reply
Anne
8/9/2017 04:50:43 pm

My thought as well.

Reply
Andy White
8/9/2017 04:54:33 pm

I'd be interested to know, but I'm not sure it matters to larger questions about how archaeologists are portrayed in the media, how female scientists are portrayed, etc. In journalism school we'd frequently debate the pros, cons, and implications of publishing photos without considering what the subject thought of the picture.

Reply
Graham
8/9/2017 05:14:39 pm

To me it looks like a staged shot. As to the camera angle, without a larger picture showing the excavation you cannot judge why that angle was chosen, but given what the subject is wearing it could simply be that that was the only way to get the subjects face in shot.

One of my favorite episodes of CSI has a murder taking place at a Buddhist temple and much of the dialog is concerned about the fact the victims were shot through a particular chakra and what this means. When the killer is caught he is asked about this and responds in confusion that he has no idea what they are talking about, he simply shot the victims between the eyes.

To bring this to a close, don't over elaborate on motives, you're not the person who took the picture nor the subject of the picture and if you do want to know why it was used, ask the editors of the newspaper.

Anne
8/9/2017 04:52:12 pm

And she's clearly wearing a tank top, not a jersey. How would one fit a mammoth tooth in a tiny shirt anyway? Headline is misleading.

Reply
GINA
8/9/2017 07:51:37 pm

She looks like she's from Jersey Shore.
This picture was not taken with good intentions. Its unprofessional and I'm more interested in the tooth from Jersey. Not the female and her cleavage. I'm disappointed.

Reply
Alan Ross
8/9/2017 10:32:26 pm

Oh Andy... surely it is actually more demeaning to the lady concerned to be discussing her n(on-visible) cleavage. It is a press photo not a journal publication. It is a looking down at woman in a trench doing a stock pointing shot. She made the find. What do you expect.,.for her to wear a bandage around her top half. She is wearing normal attire. The power of suggestion is implanting the idea that something is more visible than is not. This whole post is sexist and intrusive, by taking it out of context and discussing a woman's cleavage in a way that was never done in the first place, How do you think the woman concerned would feel at being discussed in this frankly creepy manner? It demeaning, intrusive and unjustified.

Reply
Alan Ross
8/9/2017 10:47:18 pm

Sorry my typing and punctuation was off! I couldn't see the keys. I must wear my glasses. But you'll get my general point

Reply
Andy White
8/10/2017 08:58:35 am

Yes, I get your general point, but I think you have completely missed mine.

If the photo isn't bad, how can discussing it be bad? I didn't take it out of context -- context is the whole point. I'm amazed to be told that opening a discussion about whether a photo is sexist or not is, in and of itself, a sexist thing to do. I still haven't said what my position is, so you seem to be objecting to the very idea that there could be a range of opinions on the matter. That's strange.

As I mentioned above, I'm getting the sense that this photo is a "non issue" among professional archaeologists, including many of my female colleagues. That's an interesting thing to know, and one that I would not have known without asking. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there's a generational gradient in how this photo is perceived. I could be wrong, of course. I'd never know if I didn't ask.

Reply
Graham
8/10/2017 06:32:48 pm

I find this response curious as you seem to be assuming the thoughts of the person photographed. Unless they actually respond to this or make their own statement by some other means, we will never no.

Reply
Fawkes
8/10/2017 07:54:15 pm

I think that photo being the only one is misleading for the article. I hunted for a while trying to find a mammoth tooth to see if it looked like one of mine I gave up.

It is understandable to use stock photos in certain situations to make things more attractive and sellable places do it all the time. Maybe the newspaper/magazine needs more readership or maybe this is a person from the dig. Or maybe she found the tooth and it was hot out and thus the tank top. Or maybe her name is mammoth tooth.

Reply
Uncle Ron
8/10/2017 08:03:42 pm

The story specifically states ". . . the tooth, pictured with UCL’s Letty Ingrey . . .." But there's no tooth in the pic. Maybe they were going to put the tooth back after the picture was set up; but look at her facial expression. I can hear the photographer saying, crouch down there and point to where the tooth will be . . . hold on I can't get your face in too . . . I'll get up on this ladder . . . Ok, hold it . . . oh yeah, that's great . . .. And just then she realizes what he's seeing through the camera, and Flash! Definitely click bait and definitely not appropriate for the story; not because of what's there but because of what's NOT there. If the tooth was there we could say well that's just the human body - let the frat boys leer. But without the tooth there's no excuse for using the picture EXCEPT to let the frat boys leer. (I'll bet there's another shot with the tooth in place and less of Ms. Ingrey showing.) I don't know if it's so much "how female scientists are portrayed" by the media as how women in general still are portrayed by much of the media.

Reply
Ph
8/11/2017 01:45:55 am

I guess it's just what draws your attention.
I've seen far less mammoth teeth then exposed decollete, so i was looking for a mammoth teeth in the picture and the decollete made no real impression.

She is not even trying to be in a seductive pose.

Reminds me of a T-shirt that said "Yuck Fou" that many people have to look at multiple times before their brains actually read the right words.

Reply
Zoroaster
8/19/2017 11:30:45 am

I didn't see any problem until someone in the comments said it was the boob thing. I agree with Sara, get over yourselves people.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    All views expressed in my blog posts are my own. The views of those that comment are their own. That's how it works.

    I reserve the right to take down comments that I deem to be defamatory or harassing. 

    Andy White

    Follow me on Twitter: @Andrew_A_White

    Email me: andy.white.zpm@gmail.com

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    Picture

    Sick of the woo?  Want to help keep honest and open dialogue about pseudo-archaeology on the internet? Please consider contributing to Woo War Two.
    Picture

    Follow updates on posts related to giants on the Modern Mythology of Giants page on Facebook.

    Archives

    January 2023
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    March 2021
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    3D Models
    AAA
    Adena
    Afrocentrism
    Agent Based Modeling
    Agent-based Modeling
    Aircraft
    Alabama
    Aliens
    Ancient Artifact Preservation Society
    Androgynous Fish Gods
    ANTH 227
    ANTH 291
    ANTH 322
    Anthropology History
    Anunnaki
    Appalachia
    Archaeology
    Ardipithecus
    Art
    Atlantis
    Australia
    Australopithecines
    Aviation History
    Bigfoot
    Birds
    Boas
    Book Of Mormon
    Broad River Archaeological Field School
    Bronze Age
    Caribou
    Carolina Bays
    Ceramics
    China
    Clovis
    Complexity
    Copper Culture
    Cotton Mather
    COVID-19
    Creationism
    Croatia
    Crow
    Demography
    Denisovans
    Diffusionism
    DINAA
    Dinosaurs
    Dirt Dance Floor
    Double Rows Of Teeth
    Dragonflies
    Early Archaic
    Early Woodland
    Earthworks
    Eastern Woodlands
    Eastern Woodlands Household Archaeology Data Project
    Education
    Egypt
    Europe
    Evolution
    Ewhadp
    Fake Hercules Swords
    Fetal Head Molding
    Field School
    Film
    Florida
    Forbidden Archaeology
    Forbidden History
    Four Field Anthropology
    Four-field Anthropology
    France
    Genetics
    Genus Homo
    Geology
    Geometry
    Geophysics
    Georgia
    Giants
    Giants Of Olden Times
    Gigantism
    Gigantopithecus
    Graham Hancock
    Grand Valley State
    Great Lakes
    Hollow Earth
    Homo Erectus
    Hunter Gatherers
    Hunter-gatherers
    Illinois
    India
    Indiana
    Indonesia
    Iowa
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jim Vieira
    Jobs
    Kensington Rune Stone
    Kentucky
    Kirk Project
    Late Archaic
    Lemuria
    Lithic Raw Materials
    Lithics
    Lizard Man
    Lomekwi
    Lost Continents
    Mack
    Mammoths
    Mastodons
    Maya
    Megafauna
    Megaliths
    Mesolithic
    Michigan
    Middle Archaic
    Middle Pleistocene
    Middle Woodland
    Midwest
    Minnesota
    Mississippi
    Mississippian
    Missouri
    Modeling
    Morphometric
    Mound Builder Myth
    Mu
    Music
    Nazis
    Neandertals
    Near East
    Nephilim
    Nevada
    New Mexico
    Newspapers
    New York
    North Carolina
    Oahspe
    Oak Island
    Obstetrics
    Ohio
    Ohio Valley
    Oldowan
    Olmec
    Open Data
    Paleoindian
    Paleolithic
    Pilumgate
    Pleistocene
    Pliocene
    Pre Clovis
    Pre-Clovis
    Prehistoric Families
    Pseudo Science
    Pseudo-science
    Radiocarbon
    Reality Check
    Rome
    Russia
    SAA
    Sardinia
    SCIAA
    Science
    Scientific Racism
    Sculpture
    SEAC
    Search For The Lost Giants
    Sexual Dimorphism
    Sitchin
    Social Complexity
    Social Networks
    Solutrean Hypothesis
    South Africa
    South America
    South Carolina
    Southeast
    Stone Holes
    Subsistence
    Swordgate
    Teaching
    Technology
    Teeth
    Television
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Topper
    Travel
    Travel Diaries
    Vaccines
    Washington
    Whatzit
    White Supremacists
    Wisconsin
    Woo War Two
    World War I
    World War II
    Writing
    Younger Dryas

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly