Andy White Anthropology
  • Home
  • Research Interests
    • Complexity Science
    • Prehistoric Social Networks
    • Eastern Woodlands Prehistory
    • Ancient Giants
  • Blog
  • Work in Progress
    • The Kirk Project >
      • Kirk 3D Models list
      • Kirk 3D Models embedded
      • Kirk 2D images >
        • Indiana
        • Kentucky
        • Michigan
        • Ontario
      • Kirk Project Datasets
    • Computational Modeling >
      • FN3D_V3
    • Radiocarbon Compilation
    • Fake Hercules Swords
    • Wild Carolina >
      • Plants >
        • Mosses
        • Ferns
        • Conifers
        • Flowering Plants >
          • Grasses
          • Trees
          • Other Flowering Plants
      • Animals >
        • Birds
        • Mammals
        • Crustaceans
        • Insects
        • Arachnids
        • Millipedes and Centipedes
        • Reptiles and Amphibians
      • Fungi
  • Annotated Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Technical Reports
    • Doctoral Dissertation
  • Bibliography
  • Data

The Kensington Rune Stone: The Oldest "Native" Document in America?

6/14/2016

12 Comments

 
Once I'm awake at 3 or 4 o'clock in the morning it's difficult for me to get back to sleep. So you can thank one of my kids for this blog post: an unwelcome early morning wake-up provided me an opportunity to start doing some homework on the Kensington Rune Stone (KRS).  We'll be discussing the history of analysis and interpretation of the stone in my Forbidden Archaeology class this fall during a unit on claims for pre-Colmbian transoceanic contact. If you've been following along at home, you know that Scott Wolter, a prominent advocate of the KRS, has agreed to participate in my class. I'd like to get him here to interact with my students in person, so I've started raising some travel funds: click here to contribute if you'd like to help make this happen.

Debate about the authenticity and potential implications of the KRS has gone on semi-continuously since the stone was first reported in 1898 (you can read reviews of the history of the debate here and here, among other places). As I'm in the habit of using my blog to help me organize my research, I'll probably write posts as I work my way through the debate.

This morning I read through the 1910 article by  Hjalmar Rued Holand in The Journal of American History (Volume 4, pp. 165-184, available here). The first thing that struck me was the title:
Picture
How could the KRS be an authentic European artifact and a "native" document? The last time I checked, the term "native" referred to a geographical association by birth (a person born in a place is "native" to that place). The immediate implication of Holand's word choice, I think, is that he thinks the KRS somehow legitimizes the idea that people of Norse descent are "native" to the area by virtue of a fourteenth century Norse expedition that he believes carved the stone and left it in Minnesota. It's possible I missed some nuance, as I read the paper quickly. 
The second thing that struck me is the similarity between the debates that were taking place in the first decade of the twentieth century and the debates that are still taking place today.  Then, as now, arguments about the stone's authenticity revolved around three main bullet points:
​
  • Improbability: how could a Norse party have journeyed that far into the interior of North America and left only a stone?

  • Runological correctness: are the runes and language on the stone "correct" for the mid-fourteenth century, or are they the work of a modern hoaxer?

  • Material characteristics: are the features on the modified and unmodified surfaces of the stone consistent with creation of the inscription during the fourteenth century?
Holand considers each of these in varying amounts of detail, concluding without reservation that the stone is authentic. The arguments about the runes and the geology are strikingly similar to recent treatments. Here is what he says about the geology (p. 179): 
"Another proof is the geological evidence shown in the weathering of the inscription , and in the physical changes in the region where the stone was found. This stone, being a Greywacke, is exceedingly hard, and decays extremely slowly, as is shown by the pronounced glacial markings on the back of the stone made several thousand years ago. Notwithstanding this durability the main part of the inscription presents the same ancient, mellow and weathered appearance as the untouched face of the stone. Some of the runes, however, encroach upon a calcareous incrustation which covers part of the stone. In this softer portion the characters are so worn down as to be almost unreadable. In marked contrast to these are the characters upon the edge of the stone which were scratched, when the stone was found, with a nail to dig out the dirt. After 11 1/2 years' exposure to the elements, these characters upon the edge of the stone still appear white and fresh as if cut today. This is an excellent illustration of how very slowly this hard rock decomposes. In order to have arrived at the weathered appearance of the main part of this inscription and the worn down conditions of the characters in the calcareous deposit, this inscription must have been made many hundred years ago."
As Scott Wolter has demonstrated, consideration of the runes and geology of the stone still provide grounds for discussion. Given the length of the debate about these aspects of the stone, however, I think it's reasonable to wonder if analysis of the intrinsic qualities of this single artifact will ever resolve to everyone's satisfaction the question of whether the KRS is a hoax or an authentic artifact related to a fourteenth century European expedition into the interior of North America.

As an archaeologist, the "improbability" question is of greater interest to me than questions of runes or geology. Human behavior leaves material traces. If the KRS was produced by a fourteenth century European expedition (Holand goes so far as to specify who he thinks led the expedition), I would expect that there would be some tangible traces of that expedition in addition to a carved stone (remains of campsites? European goods incorporated into Native American economies?). Those traces are not likely to be easy to find, however: we can anticipate that the residues left by a small, rapidly moving expedition would be very difficult to locate.  For the sake of comparison, consider the archaeology of early Spanish attempts to explore and colonize the Southeast. Hernando De Soto journeyed through the southeast in the mid-1500's with a small medieval army of about 600 people along with wagons, pigs, and horses.  De Soto's group (much larger, I think, than the party that most people envision would have been associated with a proposed Norse exploration of the American interior) left a very faint archaeological signature. The location of the short-lived coastal colony of San Miguel de Gualdape, occupied by 500 people for a few months in 1526-1527, has yet to be identified. The Mississippian village of Cofitachequi, visited by the De Soto expedition in 1540 and the Juan Pardo expedition in the 1560's, has yet to be identified based on positive material evidence (although it almost has to be the Mulberry site). The location of Fort San Juan, the first interior Spanish settlement in the interior of North America, was only recently confirmed to be at the Berry site in North Carolina.

While the traces left by Spanish expeditions are light, they aren't invisible. Is it possible that definitive evidence of a Norse expedition into the interior (other than the KRS) would be so light as to fly under the radar despite a century of scrutiny? It's a fair question.

I admit that my first reaction as I start to learn more about the KRS is a bit of disappointment: has the debate over this artifact really remained so static over the last 100 years? I hope not. I also find myself asking what else there is to go on at this point. Despite what the popular media tell us, archaeology is not primarily a game of singular "discoveries" like the KRS. It's about patterns, multiple lines of evidence, and putting in the hard work to understand how the past human behaviors we want to understand relate to the material traces we can observe and study. If the KRS is genuine, it's hinting at a pretty interesting story. But it won't be the only piece of evidence that can tell the story. With the main points of argument about the KRS apparently still unresolved after 100 years, I'd spend some effort pursuing other avenues if I was looking for positive evidence of Norse expedition into the interior in 1362.

I think Holand's use of "native" hints at the context of his advocacy of the KRS. That doesn't, in and of itself, mean he's wrong about the stone, however. His paper mentions several things I plan to look into further. And so it begins.
12 Comments

Crowdfunding Scott Wolter's Travel to My Class

6/13/2016

5 Comments

 
Picture
I set up a Go Fund Me campaign to raise money to fund Scott Wolter's travel to Columbia to participate in my Forbidden Archaeology class this fall. To recap, Wolter agreed to participate in my class in response to an open invitation I posted as I began constructing and organizing the course last year. While we've still got some details to work out, it looks to me like it will cost about $1000 to fly him down here and put him in a hotel for a few nights. I'm hoping he can do two class periods and have time to do some other things as well.

Forbidden Archaeology (ANT 291) will be organized around the premise that credible ideas about the human past can withstand scrutiny and challenges, while incorrect ideas can be shown to be incorrect. My goal is to give the students the confidence, tools, and information they need to critically evaluate ideas about the past. 

As Wolter has written, the Kensington Rune Stone is either a hoax or it's not -- can new interpretations of the stone be falsified? Let's find out!


I think that bringing Wolter to Columbia will greatly enhance the experience for all involved, facilitating a much broader range of interactions with my students than would be possible via remote participation (i.e., though something like Skype).  

​
If you want to help make this happen, please consider contributing to the Scott Wolter Travel Fund.

5 Comments

The Construction and Exile of My Brachiosaurus Sculpture

6/12/2016

2 Comments

 
I've written about Betty before: once here and once here. I was never in love with Betty, and tried to sell her a couple of times. The sales never worked out, and I ended up giving her to Alec Lindsay and Kate Teeter, family friends who live in Marquette, Michigan. Alec came down with a trailer and carted Betty all the way to the Upper Peninsula, where (as far as I know) she lives to this day.

Picture
Betty started with this axle unit from a self-propelled lawnmower (May 2011). I wanted to use it for something. My original idea was some kind of wind-powered phonograph. I was envisioning a frame of some kind with a turntable that would be hooked up via bicycle chains and sprockets to a windmill wheel. This axle piece would let me change the direction of rotation 90 degrees. Notice the monkey head pencil holder on the table. I've had it since I was in college. It is ugly.

Picture
I mounted part of the pedal assembly from an old bike I got from someone on Freecycle to the front fork and rigged up a bracket to hold the lawnmower axle. I welded the sprocket on but I didn't get it on straight, which was a bummer. The experience of trying to get these parts to line up so that the sprockets would turn smoothly convinced me that I didn't yet have the shop skills to make something wind-powered. The green parts are a chair I picked up off the curb (May 2011).

Picture
​At this point I had decided to build a creature of some kind, but I wasn't sure what. I knew this was going to be the torso and that I wanted some moving parts. In this photo, I was trying to figure out how to add another bicycle sprocket assembly (purple) from one of my daughter's old bicycles. I have welded on part of a hand truck (green) that also contributed parts to Eileen (May 2011).

Picture
The outlines of the torso taking shape (May 2011). Most of the rest of blue Schwinn is stuck in there, as are some motorcycle parts and pieces of bed frame. By this point I knew I was making a brachiosaurus.

Picture
I used the crane to position the torso frame so I could start working on the legs (June 2011). I wanted Betty to look as if she was in motion, not posed with all four feet on the ground. I also wanted to try to capture the right posture - longer front limbs than back limbs with a sloping back. The upper segments of the front limbs are made from bed frame parts (curb acquisition). Here I'm using a hubcap and some pan lids to stand in for the feet. At this point I had planned on making the feet out of concrete. I knew I needed to have a lot weight down low on this one because of the total height of the creature.

Picture
My wife took me to Haggerty Metal scrapyard in Plymouth for some birthday foraging (June 2011). She said "get however much of whatever you want." It was great.

Picture
​We got 208 pounds of hand-picked scrap for 60 bucks. I found four brake rotors to use as bases for the feet. The curving black parts are table legs that I used for the neck. Some of these parts went into both the body and base of the dragonfly. I also got some exhaust headers and some other things that will become part of something someday (June 2011).

Picture
This photo shows the feet and legs roughed in and some pieces in place for the neck (June 2011). The lower segments of all four limbs are pieces of MacPherson struts that I got from the scrap pile that accumulates every day behind the Midas shop. The lower segments bolt onto the upper segments: my thought was that it might be difficult to move this thing if I made the feet very heavy. Unlike during construction of the dragonfly and Eileen, I knew enough to: (1) not cut coil springs without compressing them; (2) drill a hole to drain the fluid before welding to prevent (3) explosive plumes of burning liquid from spraying on me.

Picture
​Front feet, legs, and shoulders in progress (June 2011). The right foot is tilted up using an old axe head that I've been hauling around for years. I've also incorporated a piece of suspension removed during a repair to my old car.

Picture
This photo from July 2011 shows the body after quite a bit of "filling out" work. I used a lot of bicyle parts, especially rims twisted and torqued to create sinuous lines. I used pieces of a steel arch that I bought for $7 from the ReUse Center to create parts of the back legs and part of the neck.

Picture
Betty had to move out of the garage to make room for (of all things) a car during the winter (October 2011). I had originally planned on getting a wire feed welder so that I could work on her outside, but the money I was going to use for that (from selling my car) got sucked into other things. So either Betty has to move back inside to get finished in the Spring, or a wire feed welder has to fall from the sky. I think she is close to being done and I think I've got most of the pieces I want to use.

Picture
Betty is done, at least for now (May 2012). She has moved out onto the patio. Now when I look at her I see things I like (the neck) and things I don't like (the tail). So she may not really be done.

Picture
Betty in the yard in Ann Arbor (April 2015).

Picture
Taking her apart to be moved up north as we were preparing to move south (May 2015). The kids did not want to see the big dinosaur go.

Picture
I don't who these people are, but they were having a good look while was Betty was parked somewhere in Michigan (May 2015).

Picture
Betty crossing the Mighty Mac (May 2015).

Picture
Betty enjoying a beer with her new friends in the Upper Peninsula (August 2015).

2 Comments

My Dragonfly Sculpture

6/12/2016

3 Comments

 
Dragonflies are my favorite insects: I watch them, read about them, and attempt to photograph them when opportunities present themselves (you can see some of my Michigan dragonfly photos here; some from South Carolina are here). I started my dragonfly sculpture in Ann Arbor right after I finished the triceratops. I actually made this one with the goal of selling it. I thought I had sold it when we moved, but the money didn't materialize until after I had already taken it apart, moved it, and put it back together. The price went up after that, and I ended up keeping it. And now I'm glad I did.
Picture

Picture
I inherited some motorcycle parts from a friend who was relocating to Kazakhstan (June 2011). I'm not really a fan of creating things from large,ready-shaped "building blocks," but I liked the idea of making an insect out of the gas tank because I liked the sleekness and the muscular shape. The chrome on the exhaust was nice, also. This photo shows the gas tank lying upside down. I used a piece of auto exhaust pipe to join the motorcyle exhaust to a heavy piece of auto something-or-other that I would use to attach the head.

Picture
I started building the head by trying to get the profile shape I wanted. The green piece is another motorcycle part (tail light assembly?). The gray is a piece of a satellite dish (parts of which I also used in Eileen). The angle at the bottom is formed by a piece of garage door hardware. 

There were several unsuccessful attempts at making the eyes. I tried pieces of hubcap, then builing them up from pieces of wire and bicycle chain. Those both looked terrible. Eventually I ended up forming them from odd pieces, focusing on the overall shape instead of being clever. I like the way they turned out.

Picture
Head attached to body (July 2011). I have also added the centers of three bicycle wheels to serve as attachment points for the legs.

Picture
Frames for wings attached to body (July 2011). I didn't want to attach the wings directly to the gas tank because I didn't know if the steel would be strong enough to support them rigidly in place.  So I used a piece of steel bar that I scavenged from a bulletin board discarded outside my daughter's elementary school to build a foundation for attaching them.  I arched it over the back and welded it to the head and the base of the "tail."  All four wings are welded to a plate that bolts on.  I had to buy the steel rod for making the frames for the wings.

Picture
​This photo shows the dragonfly after it tipped over the crane and fell on me (August 2011). I had to have the boom fully extended to position the dragonfly over the stand, and I neglected to put the pins in the legs of the crane, thinking it wouldn't matter because "it's not that heavy." The alert observer will notice a motorcycle parked in the foreground and a brachiosaurus being built in the background. This is a fertile, cluttered environment that makes it difficult to find space to extend the legs of one's shop crane.

Picture
I made a stand from a bunch of old pipe (found on the curb), pieces of steel signpost, and some kind of wheel hub from a truck.  It had to be heavy and stable to support all the weight and not tip over in a wind.  This photo shows the dragonfly being safely hoisted into place above the stand so that I could start to figure out the legs and feet.  I've added a few of the internal pieces to the wings - made from pieces of a steel rack/shelf (also a curb find) and parts of a wire patio planter (a gift from my brother-in-law) (August 2011).

Picture
The results of a stroller walk of several miles to the hardware store:  U-bolts for the dragonfly's feet and Twizzlers for my feet (August 2011).

Picture
I used pieces of wood from an old drying rack to figure out the length and position of the leg segments (August 2011).

Picture
Main pieces of legs attached (September 2011).  The legs are pieces of steel from various things: curtain rods, outboard motor drive shaft, etc.

Picture
The first time I moved the stand, it broke. So I had to heave it back into the garage to add more supports.  This photo shows the whole thing assembled in the garden, finally (October 2011).

Picture
Underside of the dragonfly (October 2011).

Picture
The artist poses with the dragonfly (October 2011).

Picture
Detail of the head (October 2011).

Picture
A few months outside have added some patina (January 2012).

3 Comments

My Triceratops Sculpture

6/12/2016

2 Comments

 
Some of my favorite dinosaurs are Ceratopsians. This post describes the creation of my triceratops sculpture. It was my first attempt at something large, and still has great sentimental value to me even though I would now do it much differently. It mad the trip to Columbia and is currently in my backyard.
Picture

Picture
I started in November of 2010 with a few pieces of the frame from a treadmill.  In this picture (December 2010), I've added some pieces of a furniture dolly (green), a piece of exhaust pipe, part of a lawnmower engine, the handle bars from my daughter's first bicycle (pink), and some braces or something from an outdoor playset.  I used a piece of steel rod to form the arch of the back.


Picture
The rough front feet/forelegs (December 2010). The bottoms of the feet are made from stove burner grates (purchased at the Ann Arbor ReUse Center for a few dollars).  The foreleg segments are pieces of exhaust pipe braced with bars from a fireplace grate.  The pink pieces are more bicycle parts with some kind of auto steering parts (?) stuck in them.  Also - brake shoes.

Picture
I supported the body with jackstands so I could attach the front legs and start to figure out what I was going to do for the back legs (December 2010). I used a pair of brake rotors for the front "shoulders", and pieced together the basic shape of the back legs with some pieces of treadmill frame, a pair of MacPherson struts, and some other odds and ends. This photo also shows some pipes and other things added to the body to start filling it out. I added some chain to the "backbone" because I thought I would like the texture it added. I was wrong. I removed it later.

Picture
I braced the legs with a bunch of pieces of rod I cut from an old farm gate (December 2010).  After I convinced myself that it wouldn't collapse, I removed the jackstands and started fleshing out the body.  Work slowed to a trickle during January and February: it was too cold in the garage and I had other things to do.

Picture
The first part of the head was formed from this H-shaped piece of exhaust pipe and the handle from a lawnmower (March 2011).  I made the head detachable so I could work on it more easily, and so I could take it with me if I had to sudently flee.

Picture
I found some kind of old Dremel saw in someone's "free" pile following a yard sale (March 2011).  I cut it apart and used it to form the maxilla and mandible of the head.  This photo shows the attaching of a piece of steel rod to form the edge of the frill.

Picture
This photo shows the artist standing with the foundation of the head (March 2011).  Those are chair legs standing in for the horns.

Picture
The head in progress (April 2011).  The frill is being filled in with odd pieces of sheet metal.  The red pieces are from the cover of a charcoal grill that I dragged out of the woods behind the high school.  This photo also shows the mandible moved back - I was trying to get the characteristic triceratops overbite.

Picture
The head: finished (May 2011).  I was pretty happy with this. ​

Picture
One of the last things I did was attach this bottle opener.  It was a keychain that came with the AC/DC "Bonfire" box set that a friend got me for Christmas one year.  I like that it turned an otherwise useless sculpture into a tool (May 2011).

Picture
The triceratops finally moves out of the garage (May 2011). ​

Picture
The triceratops at her post, guarding the iris (May 2011).  The gray pipe on the right rear leg is a piece of a satellite dish I found on the railroad tracks.

​

Picture
Eating a dandelion (May 2011).

Picture
Right side (May 2011).

Picture
Left side (May 2011).  The tail is also detachable.

2 Comments

I'm Moving My Art Content to this Website

6/12/2016

3 Comments

 
​I've been making things for as long as I can remember. My capacity to create what was in my head took an uptick in 2010 when I bought a stick welder and I had some space in the garage to start working with scrap metal.  I had no formal welding training but managed to build several large sculptures (without seriously injuring myself) before we chose to move. Our next house was a rental, so I ditched much of the scrap metal I had collected, stored the rest, and parked my sculptures in my mother-in-law's backyard in Ann Arbor.  The house we bought a year later had limited space and no 220-volt outlet for the welder: the sculptures moved back but the workshop stayed packed up. I eventually bought a wire-feed welder but found I had very little time/energy as I was commuting back and forth to Grand Valley State as a Visiting Assistant Professor teaching a 4/4.  

Now that we're settled in Columbia I've been able to pick up my hobby again with some regularity. I built the rabbit that I'd been saving up parts for, and I'm now working on a large Tyrannosaurus rex. I've missed creating for the sake of creating, and I feel fortunate to be able to do it again.

When I first got into the hobby, I created a website to go along with it. I put a lot of work into that site (building a lot of it "by hand" rather than using templates), but I've found that I've rarely visited it in the last few years even though I continue to pay for it.  So I'm going to migrate some of that content here as blog posts that I can refer to more easily when I want to see photos of what I've done. If you're only here for the archaeology (or the pseudo-archaeology), just hold your nose or close your eyes or do whatever you need to do to ignore the sculpture posts.

Update (12/26/2016): I'm no longer updating the list of sculpture-related posts on this page. See this page for a maintained list.
Picture

Here's a list:
  • Triceratops (Eileen)
  • Dragonfly
  • Brachiosaurus (Betty)
  • Rabbit
  • Tyrannosaurus
    • In progress (6/9/2016)
    • In progress (6/16/2016)
    • Almost done (7/1/2016 
  • Crow
    • "Upcoming Interview with "Jasper Magazine," and the Crow Is Done (I Think)" (7/22/2016)
    • "My Crow Sculpture Won First Place at the South Carolina State Fair" (10/9/2016)
  • Triceratops head (9/5/2016)
  • Pachycephalosaurus
    • Almost done (10/22/2016)
  • Various media
    • "Columbia Man Turns Trash into Art" (Mary Sturgill, WLTX, 7/12/2016)
    • "Welding Past and Present" (Chris Horn, USC Today, 7/12/2016)
    • Blog post about sculpture story on WLTX 19 (7/13/2016)
    • "Man Builds Incredible Triceratops Lawn Art out of Daughter’s First Bicycle" (Eliza Murphy, Good Morning America, 7/18/2016)
    • "Profile on Andy White – Anthropologist, Archaeologist, and Artist" (Mary Catherine Ballou, J​asper Magazine, 7/24/2016) 
3 Comments

Ten Great Moments in Swordgate History: A Look Back

6/11/2016

3 Comments

 
With 2016 almost half over, it's fair to ask again about the status of the Ancient Artifact Preservation Society's promised report on the evidence for the ancient Roman occupation of Nova Scotia. The original Boston Standard story from December 2015 stated, after all, that the report "is scheduled to be published in full in early 2016." That "early 2016" timeline for publication was confirmed in an Ancient Origins article in January. I also remember being told we'd see the report in the "spring" or "early spring." but I don't have the energy to try to track down those statements.
Picture
And it doesn't really matter: as the year nears the halfway mark and the formal beginning of summer approaches, the clock is running down on even the most generous publication timeline.  My falsifiable hypothesis is that we will never actually see the promised report (fifteenth of Nevuary, anyone?). I think Pulitzer's timing for pumping the sword story in December of 2015 was driven by his desire to get as much attention as possible prior to the appearance of the item on The Curse of Oak Island in the following January. Ironically, the spotlight he placed on the sword brought to light new data that quickly and fatally undermined his ironclad guarantee that it was a "100 percent confirmed . . . smoking gun" artifact.  Within days of the original Boston Standard story, it was obvious to any reasonable person that the "ancient Roman sword from Nova Scotia" was nothing of the sort.  Never one to let facts get in the way of a good story, however, Pulitzer has stood by the sword for months and continues to do so. I can't help but think that the enthusiasm for releasing the full report has been significantly diminished, however.

With hopes for release of the fabled "white paper" evaporating and the recent documentation of the thirteenth Fake Hercules Sword (and because my kids woke me up at 3:00 a.m. and I couldn't get back to sleep), it seems like a good time to take a look back at some great moments in Swordgate history. These are just a few of my favorites in roughly chronological order.

  • December 16-18: The Sword Rain Begins
Picture
For once in my life, I was happy to be a born procrastinator. If I was a person who acted quickly, I would have thrown out my obsolete history textbooks with the publication of the original Boston Standard story proclaiming them all to be wrong. Thank goodness I dallied! Within 48 hours of the spread of the original sword story, what started as a trickle of other "Roman swords" had turned into a torrent (the Florida sword, the California sword, the Italian eBay sword, the Design Toscano swords . . .).  This was an amazing display of the ground-up capacity of the internet to produce new and useful information to solve a puzzle. It was clear that the proponents of the "Roman sword from Nova Scotia" were unprepared to explain the number of similar swords that existed and the rapidity with which they would surface. The appearance of these swords and what they could tell us about the "Roman sword" claim quickly began driving the story. It's clear to me, looking back now, that Swordgate was actually won within the first 48 hours of the battle.

  • December 17: The Legal Threats Begin
As the appearance of more and more "Roman swords" diluted the impact of Pulitzer's "100 percent confirmed" claim, he threatened me with legal action several times (you can read about his threats to me here and here and to Jason Colavito here). He was ostensibly upset both about some third party comments an old blog post of mine and that I had used "his" image of the sword without his permission. It was pretty silly: here was someone trying to make hay by fighting to reveal "forbidden history and hidden truth," claiming he was going to sue me for copyright infringement for using the same photo of the sword that everyone else was using. In one email, he threatened to file a lawsuit primarily for the purpose of costing me money:  

"See, takes nothing to file the suit, takes a tremendous amount to get out of one."


Yes, those first 48 hours of the battle revealed a lot.
  • December-January: Adding Weak Coffee to Weak Coffee Does Not Make Strong Coffee
Picture
Adding weak coffee to weak coffee does not make strong coffee (I remain sorry that I'm unable to credit this metaphor to whomever I stole it from, but I find it useful and I'm going to continue to use it even though it's not original). We were told that the "Roman sword" was the "smoking gun" artifact that made the case for a Roman occupation of Nova Scotia. As the credibility of both that claim and the individuals tied to it (Pulitzer and the Ancient Artifact Preservation Society) were being irreparably weakened by the mounting evidence that the sword was not an ancient Roman artifact, Pulitzer began to emphasize other pieces of his "case." We were told of a Roman shield boss found on Nova Scotia in the original article (with a picture showing a shield boss from the British Museum with an "InvestigatingHistory.org" copyright mark, which remains in the Daily Mail story to this day even after Pulitzer threatened to sue me again for pointing it out and then said he'd have it fixed). We were also treated to a story about "crossbow bolts" that are likely pieces of old logging tools and an inscribed stone that,when viewed in the  right orientation, clearly says "Harold." Needless to say, none of these these pieces of evidence added any significant weight to the sword claims. But they were pretty funny.

  • December 22: The Sword Magically Reveals Its Origin Story
Picture
As an early Christmas present, we were told that the beat-ass looking copper alloy Hercules sword supposedly found in the waters off Nova Scotia possessed magical navigational qualities by virtue of a lodestone embedded in the hilt that "causes the sword to point to true north." Pulitzer provided zero evidence for this assertion, and seems to have borrowed the narrative wholesale from David Kenney's Roman Officer site (the home of the Florida sword, which was one of the few swords Pulitzer was aware of when he came up with his Roman Scotia story). That the sword's background story was cribbed from another source will surprise no-one who has followed Pulitzer's penchant for "borrowing" content and putting his name on it. Incidentally, in his blog post about the magical qualities of the sword, Pulitzer also asserted (again) the existence of an "original" in a Naples museum (he has never produced any evidence of such an original) and made the evidence-free claim that ancient Romans made a set of ten swords. Those claims have been hanging out there for months now with nothing to back them up.

  • January 10: Commodus's Secret Probably Not Destined to Become One of the Summer's Top Beach Reads 
Picture
Apparently the "magical Herculean north-pointing navigational device" scenario was an important element to Pultizer's planned book titled Commodus's Secret: Dirty Secrets Behind History Channel's "Curse of Oak Island" and the Truth about the Lost Roman Legion, Holy Solomonic Relics and the Secret of Hercules of the North. The book was available for pre-order until I started writing about it (here and here), after which the sites and videos advertising the book became inaccessible. I have no idea how many people pre-ordered the book, whether any of those people have attempted to get their money back, and what the results of those attempts have been. Although I can't say the book won't come out, I am not optimistic that you'll be able to spend your summer on the beach reading about Commodus and his legions of swords.

  • January 11: World's Greatest Treasure Hunter Thinks Brass is Gold
Picture
,If I was trying to convince the world I was the best treasure hunter ever, I would try to avoid saying stupid things directly related to the identification of valuable metals like, say, gold. In a very clear case of "I don't know what I'm talking about," Pulitzer identified exposed brass on the knees of the Hercules figure on the hilt as gold. After I pointed out the dumbness of that assertion (along with several other obvious misinterpretations by Pulitzer in that post and a follow-up), I saw calls online that I should be fired from my job.  Sorry, Pulitzer fans, but that didn't happen: no matter where I work or don't work, no matter how disappointing it is, and now matter how awesome Pulitzer's Commander costume is, brass is still not gold. 

  • January 13: The Real Human Media Finally Chime In
Picture
Several weeks elapsed between the the cut-and-paste kissy face echo chamber produced by online "news" sites reproducing the original Boston Standard story and the participation of actual human journalists doing what journalists should do: asking questions to put the story in context. In mid-January, we saw new critical articles in the The Halifax Chronicle Herald and the Iquisitr. A story titled "The Curse of Hoax Island . . ." appeared in Frank Magazine. Pulitzer responded to the Frank Magazine piece by releasing an audio clip purportedly demonstrating that the author of the story, Mike Gorman, wouldn't listen to Pulitzer's side of the story.  The audio clip was, in fact, edited from an unrelated conversation between Pulitzer and Gorman from about a year earlier. Oh my. 

  • January 17: Pulitzer Lies (Again) About the Other Swords
Picture
Evidence not breaking down in your favor? Threats of lawsuits not working? Can't scrub away the inconvenient facts? Just keep on lying, I guess . . . Keeping track of all the different swords became tricky as more and more surfaced, and, somewhat ironically, it seemed to become easier for Pulitzer to confuse his followers about them (either that or he couldn't keep track of them all himself). He has consistently misrepresented the identities and characteristics of the other swords since they started appearing, trying to explain them away as some kind of elaborate mirage. I wrote about one of the clearest demonstrations of his propensity to lie here, describing a series of bizarre audio responses to someone in his Facebook group who had dared to publicly question him. You can still find examples online of his followers purposefully confusing the various swords, I suppose because it lets them keep the dream alive. (I've got a page devoted to the Fake Hercules Swords -- keeping track of them really isn't that complicated).

  • January 18-25: A Triple Punch Knocks the "Roman Sword" to the Canvas
Picture
Swordgate came to a head in late January when three independent analyses convincingly nailed the "Roman sword" into its coffin for good. Two of those analyses (those of Myles McCallum and Christa Brosseau) were summarized in serial episodes of The Curse of Oak Island wherein the Nova Scotia sword itself was examined. The third analysis is the ground-up, group effort that unfolded on this blog. By the eve of the sword's appearance on The Curse of Oak Island, we had amassed a critical mass of data that allowed us to identify a set of casting anomalies common to the blades of several of the swords, including the "Roman sword" from Nova Scotia.  Given the greater amount of detail and presence of features on the California sword that are absent from the Nova Scotia and Italian eBay swords, those "Type J" swords almost certainly post-date the California sword. If the California sword is a recent creation, then, so are the rest of the swords that represent later generations. I remain very proud of the data gathering and analysis that we accomplished on this blog:  it is, as far as I know, an effort and a result that has no precedent. Stop me before I tear up! 

  • February 1: Godzilla vs. King Kong
Picture
For my tenth "great moment," I'm going to choose the public war of words between Pulitzer and Kevin Burns (the executive producer of The Curse of Oak Island).  You can read my take on the exchange here and here. Jason Colavito's discussions are here and here (I borrowed the Godzilla vs. King Kong analogy from him). At this point, the authenticity of the sword itself was no longer a question for serious consideration and The Curse of Oak Island (aka Watching Paint Dry Inside 10X) had strangled just about all the publicity it could from the whole debacle. Pulitzer still didn't quit, of course, eventually producing a 200-page "report" attempted to rebut Christa Brosseau's analysis using a combination of technical misinterpretations, cut-and-paste content, and overwhelming file size. One can online imagine what the "white paper" will be like if it ever appears.

There were, of course, many other great moments in Swordgate both in terms of the overall story and the personal connections that I made (I didn't mention Peter Guezen's poster series, Killbuck's cartoons, the individuals who lent me their swords for analysis, Pulitzer's bizarre Periscope broadcasts, the great contributions of thinking and data from the readers of this blog, and the interactions I had with numerous people from Nova Scotia and elsewhere who have taken an active interest in the puzzle of the Fake Hercules Swords. I don't know when and if anything like this will happen again, but I won't bet against it.  I'm sure there are others besides me who count the whole experience as a good one. 
3 Comments

What's the Problem with Nephilim-Pigs (and Re-Packaging Someone Else's Content)?

6/10/2016

4 Comments

 
I wasn't planning on writing a blog post today. If I did get around to writing one, it was going to be about sea turtles and coastal hunting-gathering economies.  But then I found a link to the story "The Problem with Nephilim-Pigs" (published by SkyWatchTV, which bills itself as performing "Investigations into prophecy, discovery, and the supernatural") as I was going through emails and it seemed important that I pass it on to those of you who, like me, have your antennae up for something other than what you're supposed to be doing on a Friday morning. 

As a fan of both giants and pigs, I was disappointed to see that the Nephilim-pig story was much less exciting than the headline suggested. It consists of a single paragraph stating that our ability to manipulate the genes of animals is running ahead of our discussions of the ethical issues raised by such behaviors.  That's it. There's no direct mention of Nephilim, angels, the End Times, super soldier pigs, or any of that stuff in the actual text. What actually is the problem with Nephilim-pigs? You left me hanging, SkyWatchTV. Yawn.

So what was the point?

Most of my readers will be unsurprised to learn that the listed author of the piece ("SkyWatch Editor") simply copied, pasted, and rearranged content from a legitimate story, modified the headline, and slapped the mess on a page as "news."  The "read more" link takes you to a June 3rd article in Slate titled "The Problem with Super-Muscly Pigs."  Here's a side by side comparison:
Picture
SkyWatchTV article (left) and Slate article (right). They even stole the graphic.
Given all the jibber-jabber circulating in the Nephilim whirlpool about genetic engineering, etc., our friend SkyWatch Editor didn't have to do anything to earn his/her paycheck but crib some technical-sounding sentences from the original and insert "Nephilim" into the headline. Genetic engineering = satanic . . . message sent with no need to expend precious calories producing anything original. Pack up your CopyCat and head home for an early lunch!

I'm sure there's a technical term for this strategy of producing "original" content via copy/paste and a headline change, but I don't know it. So I'll just call it what it is: lazy and deceptive.

SkyWatchTV gets an F on this assignment. Please write something original about Nephilim-pigs and resubmit for partial credit.
4 Comments

I Spent the Day Working on my Tyrannosaurus Rex

6/9/2016

3 Comments

 
I spent the day working on my Tyrannosaurus rex sculpture. I'm sorry if you're waiting on me to do something or answer something or read something: I needed a day off, and it's summer, and there's an unfinished T. rex in my garage.
Picture
I've still got a lot of work to do on the body, but I spent most of the day working on the head.  The head has been hard to get going on for a couple of reasons: (1) it's an important part and I want to end up with something I'm really happy with; (2) I'm using an aluminum gas tank (from an outboard motor) as the "base" to build from.  I can only weld ferrous metals, so I've had to devise ways to anchor some steel parts to the aluminum in order to start working toward the shape and look I want. I chose to use the gas tank because it is about the right shape and size and it's a momento of a day trip I took to Bay City, Michigan, with my daughter a long time ago.  And it's light, which is important because I need to keep the weight of the sculpture down at the extremes since it will be standing on two legs.

Anyway, I finally got around to forming the basic shape of the head with steel rods (mostly scraps from old cooling racks) and some pieces of sheet metal and other odds and ends. I've got the protruding teeth roughed out (the mouth will be closed) and I've got a framework for the mandible.  The mandible isn't attached to the head yet and the head isn't attached to the body because it's still easier to work on them with the ability to turn them upside down, etc. 

I'm pretty happy with the way this is turning out. I've got plenty of bendable steel rod to form the rest of the contours, but I'm starting to run short on interesting sheet metal. Tomorrow is a "machine comes along and scrapes up everyone's curb trash piles" day in Columbia, though, so I may spend the morning scouting around for some interesting scrap so I can finish this thing soon.


3 Comments

Prepare Yourselves for Armageddon: The 13th Sword Has Been Found!

6/8/2016

5 Comments

 
We all knew it would happen at some point, and finally our wait is over: the thirteenth Fake Hercules Sword has finally surfaced!  What does that mean?  No-one really knows. But with this ominous omen and summer gas prices expected to plummet, it's probably as good a time as any to load your mini-van with weapons, stock up on canned goods, and head for your bunker.

News of Sword 13 (the Alejandro Sword) came to us via a comment by Alejandro on this blog post a few days ago while I was on vacation. Thankfully, alert citizen, Spanish speaker, and Friend of #Swordgate Pablo Raw followed up on Alejandro's comment and gathered information and photos about the sword.  Thanks to both Pablo and Alejandro - I owe you both a beer (if you've been keeping score at home, you'll know that I now owe Pablo two beers).

Here is a portion of Alejandro's account as he emailed it followed by Pablo's translation:

"Ésta espada en concreto, me refiero a la famosa espada ceremonial, si bien no era más que una mera reproducción, tenía cierto encanto. La adquirió en un viaje a Italia, en concreto a la ciudad de Pompeya. No puedo precisar si salió de la sección de souvenirs del Museo Arqueológico Nacional de Nápoles, de un vendedor ambulante, o de la misma ciudad Pompeya; pero puedo asegurar que las palabras literales de este buen amigo cuando me la obsequió fueron: “Ya tienes una espada de Pompeya”. De lo que no hay duda alguna es de que esta espada fue adquirida en Italia. Todo esto sucedió hace unos 20 años aproximadamente, la fecha exacta no puedo recordarla, pero aseguro con certeza que llegó a mis manos allá por 1996. Desde entonces luce entre mi colección."

"This specific sword, (I’m talking about  the ceremonial sword), it was clearly a reproduction, but  it  had a certain charm  to it. He got it on a trip to Italy, specifically in the city  of Pompeii. I can’t tell if it came out of the souvenirs store of the National Archaeological Museum of Napoli, a street vendor, or just somewhere in the city of Pompeii, but I can  tell that his literal words when he gave it to me where: “Now you  own  a  sword from Pompeii”. There is no  doubt  that  the sword was acquired in  Italy. All this  happened 20 years ago approximately, the exact date I can’t remember, but I can assure that I got it around 1996. Since then, it is part  of my collection."
​
Here are some photos of Sword 13:
Picture
Composite illustration showing the front and back of Sword 13.
Picture
Hilt of Sword 13 (front).
Picture
Hilt of Sword 13 (back).
Sword 13 appears to be a copper alloy sword with a heavy artificial patina that has been worn from the high spots to expose the underlying brass (followers of this blog will remember how the self-proclaimed Commander of the world's best "professional treasure hunting" team misidentified the exposed brass on the Nova Scotia sword as gold). The Hercules figure preserves more detail than the cast iron Design Toscano swords, but appears crudely cast/finished with some prominent mold seams in the areas between the head and arms, some filled-in areas (e.g., to the left of the tail of Hercules' lion skin), and some pits that are not present on the Design Toscano sword (e.g., on the back of Hercules' head).

As far as the blade goes, I don't see any of the anomalies used to the define the Type J swords (i.e., the Nova Scotia Sword, the Italian eBay Sword, the Florida Sword, and the France Sword).  A side-by-side comparison of Sword 13 with the 3D model of the Italian eBay Sword suggests that the blade of Sword 13 is the shorter of the two.  The blade of Sword 13 appears to be shaped like the the blade of the Design Toscano sword, but lacks some of the distinctive characteristics of the Design Toscano example that I have in my office. 
Picture
Comparison of the Alejandro Sword (Sword 13; top) with 3D model of the Italian eBay sword (Sword 4; bottom).
Where does Sword 13 fit in the grand scheme of Fake Hercules Swords?  It looks to me at first glance as if it belongs pretty comfortably with what we're calling Type CS (which includes the Spain Sword, the Florida eBay Sword, and the Cvet Sword).  These are copper alloy swords with blades that are shorter than those of the Type J sword and lack the casting anomalies used to define Type J. I have yet to examine any of the Type CS swords first-hand.  

We have a purchase date and location for the Alejandro sword (1996, Pompeii) that fits pretty nicely with the purchase date and location reported for the Cvet Sword (2004, Pompeii). (Although we never got a good photo of the Benjamin Sword, purchased in 2005 in Pompeii, I suspect it is also a Type CS based on the apparent blade length.) We know that the Type F swords (California and Sonja) were for sale in the 1970's. And we know the Design Toscano swords are still being made today. I think the most reasonable hypothesis is that the Type J swords were probably produced sometime between the 1970's and 1990's, with the Alejandro Swords and the other Type CS swords being a later generation.  Maybe something like this:
Picture
That's just a hypothesis, of course, but one that I think it's consistent with everything we now know. As I wrote back in January, we would expect the hilt dimensions of the Type CS swords to be intermediate between those of the the Type J swords and the Design Toscano swords if Type CS really does fall between the two in a generational copy chain. I think the photos that Alejandro sent are good enough to derive some measurements that I can compare to those I have from other swords. I'll try to do that soon and provide an updated database.

Thanks again, Alejandro and Pablo. Nice work!
5 Comments
Forward>>

    All views expressed in my blog posts are my own. The views of those that comment are their own. That's how it works.

    I reserve the right to take down comments that I deem to be defamatory or harassing. 

    Andy White

    Follow me on Twitter: @Andrew_A_White

    Email me: andy.white.zpm@gmail.com

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    Picture

    Sick of the woo?  Want to help keep honest and open dialogue about pseudo-archaeology on the internet? Please consider contributing to Woo War Two.
    Picture

    Follow updates on posts related to giants on the Modern Mythology of Giants page on Facebook.

    Archives

    August 2021
    March 2021
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    3D Models
    AAA
    Adena
    Afrocentrism
    Agent Based Modeling
    Agent-based Modeling
    Aircraft
    Alabama
    Aliens
    Ancient Artifact Preservation Society
    Androgynous Fish Gods
    ANTH 227
    ANTH 291
    ANTH 322
    Anthropology History
    Anunnaki
    Appalachia
    Archaeology
    Ardipithecus
    Art
    Atlantis
    Australia
    Australopithecines
    Aviation History
    Bigfoot
    Birds
    Boas
    Book Of Mormon
    Broad River Archaeological Field School
    Bronze Age
    Carolina Bays
    Ceramics
    China
    Clovis
    Complexity
    Copper Culture
    Cotton Mather
    COVID-19
    Creationism
    Croatia
    Crow
    Demography
    Denisovans
    Diffusionism
    DINAA
    Dinosaurs
    Dirt Dance Floor
    Double Rows Of Teeth
    Dragonflies
    Early Archaic
    Early Woodland
    Earthworks
    Eastern Woodlands
    Eastern Woodlands Household Archaeology Data Project
    Education
    Egypt
    Europe
    Evolution
    Ewhadp
    Fake Hercules Swords
    Fetal Head Molding
    Field School
    Film
    Florida
    Forbidden Archaeology
    Forbidden History
    Four Field Anthropology
    Four-field Anthropology
    France
    Genetics
    Genus Homo
    Geology
    Geometry
    Geophysics
    Georgia
    Giants
    Giants Of Olden Times
    Gigantism
    Gigantopithecus
    Graham Hancock
    Grand Valley State
    Great Lakes
    Hollow Earth
    Homo Erectus
    Hunter Gatherers
    Hunter-gatherers
    Illinois
    India
    Indiana
    Indonesia
    Iowa
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jim Vieira
    Jobs
    Kensington Rune Stone
    Kentucky
    Kirk Project
    Late Archaic
    Lemuria
    Lithic Raw Materials
    Lithics
    Lizard Man
    Lomekwi
    Lost Continents
    Mack
    Mammoths
    Mastodons
    Maya
    Megafauna
    Megaliths
    Mesolithic
    Michigan
    Middle Archaic
    Middle Pleistocene
    Middle Woodland
    Midwest
    Minnesota
    Mississippi
    Mississippian
    Missouri
    Modeling
    Morphometric
    Mound Builder Myth
    Mu
    Music
    Nazis
    Neandertals
    Near East
    Nephilim
    Nevada
    New Mexico
    Newspapers
    New York
    North Carolina
    Oahspe
    Oak Island
    Obstetrics
    Ohio
    Ohio Valley
    Oldowan
    Olmec
    Open Data
    Paleoindian
    Paleolithic
    Pilumgate
    Pleistocene
    Pliocene
    Pre Clovis
    Pre-Clovis
    Prehistoric Families
    Pseudo Science
    Pseudo-science
    Radiocarbon
    Reality Check
    Rome
    Russia
    SAA
    Sardinia
    SCIAA
    Science
    Scientific Racism
    Sculpture
    SEAC
    Search For The Lost Giants
    Sexual Dimorphism
    Sitchin
    Social Complexity
    Social Networks
    Solutrean Hypothesis
    South Africa
    South America
    South Carolina
    Southeast
    Stone Holes
    Subsistence
    Swordgate
    Teaching
    Technology
    Teeth
    Television
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Topper
    Travel
    Travel Diaries
    Vaccines
    Washington
    Whatzit
    White Supremacists
    Wisconsin
    Woo War Two
    World War I
    World War II
    Writing
    Younger Dryas

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly